| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 245 words from this article are provided below; about 449 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Methods/Theory

Roy Harris. The Linguistics of History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2004. Pp. xi, 244. $89.00.

This polemical essay, written by a professor of linguistics, is concerned with the assumptions about language made by historians in the course of writing about the past. The term "writing" needs to be emphasized, since Harris argues that institutionalized history goes back to the "literate revolution" in ancient Greece and "embraced all the question-begging involved in reducing the oral to the written" (p. 67). Roy Harris claims that "throughout the Western tradition, the basic options in philosophy of history have been determined by the basic options in philosophy of language" (p. vii). He criticizes many historians for their "reocentrism"—in other words, for regarding the meanings of words "as deriving ultimately from things in the external world" (p. 3)—arguing that this assumption leads them to reify abstractions or, as R. G. Collingwood put it, to "freeze" the stream of historical thought. However, supporters of "psychocentric" and "contractual" views of language (according to which the meanings of words derive respectively from ideas in the mind or from social convention) do not escape whipping. Historians in general, more exactly "the majority of traditional historians from Herodotus onwards" (p. 19), are faulted for their uncritical acceptance of what Harris, as in earlier books, describes as "the language myth," according to which the messages received by hearers or readers are essentially the same as the messages sent to them.

. . .

There are about 449 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.