You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 114 words from this article are provided below; about 576 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 111.1 | The History Cooperative
111.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2006
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern



Mikael Hörnqvist. Machiavelli and Empire. (Ideas in Context, number 71.) New York: Cambridge University Press. 2004. Pp. xi, 302. $75.00.

Mikael Hörnqvist's book thoughtfully situates Niccolò Machiavelli in historical context and offers many careful, subtle, detailed readings of his works. Following J. G. A. Pocock and Victoria Kahn, Hörnqvist claims that the classically trained Machiavelli should be read rhetorically and that his works constitute calculated interventions in contemporary debates. Hörnqvist distinguishes his approach from those of Thomas M. Greene and John Najemy, who stress the indeterminacy and instability of Machiavelli's works. By contrast, Hörnqvist's Machiavelli is in control everywhere; unlike Homer, he never nods. . . .

There are about 576 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.