You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 182 words from this article are provided below; about 577 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 109.5 | The History Cooperative
109.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Howard Schweber. The Creation of American Common Law, 1850–1880: Technology, Politics, and the Construction of Citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2004. Pp. viii, 296. $60.00.

Howard Schweber holds advanced degrees in law, history, and political science, all of them put to good use in this insightful book. As the title indicates, Schweber's central claim is a bold one. In response to the rapid growth of railroads, he argues, American courts so altered the common law in the decade before the Civil War as to give it a new and distinctively American form. Whether Schweber adequately supports this claim is likely to be a matter of contention among legal historians, some of whom may well doubt that the changes he notes in judges' common law rulings were extensive or significant enough to constitute the creation of an American common law. That some sort of significant transformation in the common law took place in this period, however, seems well established by Schweber's subtle analysis of rulings in eight states between 1850 and 1880. . . .

There are about 577 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.