You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 160 words from this article are provided below; about 528 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.4 | The History Cooperative
108.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2003
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern



Margarete Myers Feinstein. State Symbols: The Quest for Legitimacy in the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, 1949–1959. (Studies in Central European Histories.) Boston: Brill. 2001. Pp. xxiii, 255.

The basic question asked in this book by Margarete Myers Feinstein is suggested in the subtitle. In 1949, two new German states, one capitalist and one communist, were created on territory that between 1871 and 1945 had been part of a larger, unified Germany. Defeat in World War II had destroyed and discredited the National Socialist regime but also called into question other parts of a common German history, such as its military, imperial, and administrative traditions. To survive and prosper, presumably both successor states needed to convince their citizens and those of neighboring states of their legitimacy. Moreover, each German state denied the legitimacy of the other. So how might the legitimacy of a state be established? . . .

There are about 528 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.