You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 315 words from this article are provided below; about 529 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.1 | The History Cooperative
108.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern



Peter Jackson. France and the Nazi Menace: Intelligence and Policy Making, 1933–1939. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. Pp. xii, 446. $80.00.

This book examines the French response to the challenge presented by Nazi Germany from the rise of Adolf Hitler in 1933 to the outbreak of World War II in 1939. It focuses on the relationship between French intelligence on German intentions and capabilities and the development of French national policy. Generally speaking, two schools of thought about French strategy and diplomacy have emerged over the last two decades. The first views French policy through the optic of decadence and is consistent with the traditional Gaullist perception that, by 1939, the Third Republic was in an advanced stage of decline. Scholars such as Jean-Baptiste Duroselle, Anthony Adamthwaite, and François Bédarida argue that France's political and military leaders surrendered to drift and indecision during the interwar period. An opposing school, represented by historians like Robert Young, Elisabeth du Réau, and Martin Alexander, rejects the notion of decadence and argues instead that France's leaders pursued foreign and defense policies that were quite reasonable and explicable given the enormous domestic political, social, and economic challenges they faced. Their failures in the realm of military security were not due to corruption or moral decay. 1
     The role of intelligence in the evolution of France's foreign and defense policies has not been integrated into this debate, and that is the gap that Peter Jackson seeks to fill. His largely successful effort brings him squarely into the camp of those scholars who reject the concept of decadence and moral fecklessness. Moreover, his thorough academic study of French intelligence during the 1930s will surely pave the way for broader chronological analyses such as those dealing with American, British, and Soviet intelligence that have appeared in the last fifteen years or so. . . .


There are about 529 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.