You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 230 words from this article are provided below; about 649 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Film Review | The American Historical Review, 107.4 | The History Cooperative
107.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Film Review


Black Hawk Down. Produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and Ridley Scott; directed by Ridley Scott; screenplay by Ken Nolan. 2001; color; 144 minutes. Distributed by Sony Pictures.

Still irate about what Jerry Bruckheimer and friends had done to the history of the Asian-Pacific War in Pearl Harbor (2001), I approached this film skeptically, although I knew Ridley Scott was the director and I had read Mark Bowden's excellent book upon which it is based. But Black Hawk Down is the most intense and graphic war film I have yet seen—it won the Academy Award for sound, as well as editing—and my initial reaction was that this amounted to a "docudrama" portraying American soldiers' heroism and sacrifices as accurately and honestly as possible. But was this action without deeper ethos? Does Scott offer, finally, spectacle over substance? 1
     Then, as after Gladiator (2000), images and moments began returning. U.S. soldiers refer to the malnourished Somalis as "skinnies" while eating colorful, luscious heaps of food from their mess trays in their insulated American enclave. Their young faces earnestly accept the confident orders of General Garrison—well played by Sam Shepard—for a quick, "surgical" strike downtown to capture aides of the tribal strongman Aidid. They gird themselves for battle with individual weapons rivaling World War II tank armaments. They mount helicopters and wheeled vehicles, which roar out of base, seemingly invincible. . . .


There are about 649 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.