You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 528 words from this article are provided below; about 523 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.4 | The History Cooperative
107.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Middle East and Northern Africa


Daniel Lefeuvre. Chère Algérie: Comptes et mécomptesde la tutelle coloniale, 1930–1962. Foreword by Jacques Marseille. (Études, new series, number 15.) Saint-Denis: Société Française d'Histoire d'Outre-Mer; distributed by Didier Érudition, Paris. 1997. Pp. 397. 170 FR.

"Chère Algérie" ("Dear Algeria") has the same double meaning in French that it has in English: Algeria was both an object of affection and represented a high expense. Daniel Lefeuvre, the leading student of Jacques Marseille, follows his teacher's views that empire was overall an unprofitable venture. In this study, based on his dissertation, Lefeuvre looks at the economic relations between France and Algeria from the 1930s to independence, concentrating on government-business relations in regards to the North African possession. He documents the truth that President Charles de Gaulle shared with his countrymen in April 1961 when he pronounced that "Algeria costs us—that's the least one can say—more than it provides." 1
     A recurrent theme throughout the period of Lefeuvre's study is that the successive governments that shaped economic policies for Algeria were less interested in profit than in social and political stability in Algeria. If the government tried to direct investments to Algeria, it was to prevent what it recognized to be a coming implosion as a result of the colony's dramatic population increase. Because employment opportunities were unable to keep up with population growth, Muslims were becoming increasingly restive, open to nationalist propaganda. As late as 1958, when de Gaulle instituted the Constantine plan for the industrialization of Algeria, economic growth and stability were seen as effective antidotes to nationalism. 2
     The study is based on hitherto unavailable government documents and an unprecedented access of a number of important business archives. They reveal that French business on the whole was reluctant to invest in Algeria, seeing it as unprofitable because its inefficient labor force and poor communications made production costly, while the market was too restricted. At its height, the European population numbered one million with an average income that was twenty percent less than that of metropolitan French citizens, while the Muslim population prior to the outbreak of the Algerian War in 1954 numbered eight million, with an average income that was but a tenth that of the European inhabitants of the colony. This was not a tempting market for French businesses desiring to expand or diversify. 3
     Lefeuvre starts his account in the 1930s, during the Depression. He finds that while France's trade increased with Algeria in this period, the terms of trade benefitted the latter. For instance, wanting to protect Algeria's wine market, French authorities raised tariffs on Italian and Spanish wine, considerably cheaper than that from the North African colony. The French consumer was subsidizing the Algerian wine maker. From then until the end of colonization, Algeria imported from France more than it exported to it, creating a deficit that was covered by the metropole. "The province was on artificial respiration," remarks Lefeuvre (p. 48). Since France provided protection for Algerian goods, they found a ready market, unavailable elsewhere. Other Mediterranean countries successfully competed with Algerian agriculture, depriving Algeria of any markets but those of France. . . .


There are about 523 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.