You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 158 words from this article are provided below; about 510 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5 | The History Cooperative
106.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Andrea Friedman. Prurient Interests: Gender, Democracy, and Obscenity in New York City, 1909–1945. (Columbia Studies in Contemporary American History.) New York: Columbia University Press. 2000. Pp. x, 290. Cloth $40.00, paper $17.50.

What is obscene? Is it enough to say, with Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, "I know it when I see it?" If so, who is to be the "I," the judge of obscenity? If not, what are the standards to be used? And once obscenity is determined (if it can be), what ought to be done about it? Should the First Amendment be interpreted to protect all forms of speech or is obscene speech to be excluded? Finally, what is the harm that obscenity generates? These questions are at the heart of the modern dilemma over obscenity. They are the questions that the subjects of this fine book debated in New York in the period 1909–1945. . . .


There are about 510 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.