You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 271 words from this article are provided below; about 575 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5 | The History Cooperative
106.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Susan A. Glenn. Female Spectacle: The Theatrical Roots of Modern Feminism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2000. Pp. x, 294. $35.00.

Susan A. Glenn has produced an important study of women in the theater and their relationship to the early twentieth century's feminist movement. She argues that through spectacle, women of vaudeville and theater "became agents and metaphors of changing gender relations" (p. 3). Her book adds to a body of scholarship on women in the theater that includes Faye Dudden's Women and American Theatre: Actresses and Audiences, 1790–1870 (1994) and Robert Allen's Horrible Prettiness: Burlesque and American Culture (1991). All three of these works demonstrate that theater's formative or transitional periods permit women a fair amount of power over their performance that declines rapidly as male theater impresarios establish their control. 1
     Glenn's work argues that female performance in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century projected a protofeminism that redefined women's images, challenged gender expectations, and even presaged modern feminism. Organizing her work thematically, she begins with a discussion of France's Sarah Bernhardt as the archetype of the transgressive spectacular woman. Bernhardt's numerous United States farewell tours demonstrated her massive appeal with American theater-goers. Although she performed exclusively in French, Bernhardt's technique, resting on physical exaggeration and blatant emoting, proved especially attractive to U.S. women. Glenn contends that "female audiences in particular strongly identified with and wanted to see actresses giving free reign to their passion" (p. 21). Such emotional displays countered rigid standards of appropriate female behavior and encouraged women to express their feelings as well as their individuality. . . .


There are about 575 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.