You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 291 words from this article are provided below; about 596 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5 | The History Cooperative
106.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Asia


Mikael S. Adolphson. The Gates of Power: Monks, Courtiers, and Warriors in Premodern Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. 2000. Pp. xvii, 456. Cloth $60.00, paper $29.95.

Mikael S. Adolphson provides us with a detailed analysis of the relationships among aristocrats, temples, and the emerging warrior class in Japan from the eleventh to fourteenth centuries. Employing a modified form of Kuroda Toshio's kenmon ("Gates of Power") thesis, from which this work takes its title, the author introduces readers to the ways in which religious institutions complemented and competed with the gradually receding authority of the court aristocracy and the emerging authority of the warriors. Adolphson addresses a fundamental omission in our studies of medieval Japanese history: the degree to which the flowering of samurai influence replaced or complemented aristocratic rule in the late twelfth and thirteenth centuries has been the subject of sometimes heated discussion in the English literature, but regardless of which position one examines, the role of religious institutions is strikingly underplayed. 1
     Two fundamental problems result from this long-standing tendency. The first, which Adolphson notes, lies in the failure to provide political and social context for the development of religion in Japan, especially the development of particular religious organizations. The second, which he addresses in part here, is the role of religion in society and politics. His work gives us a clear view of how religious organizations functioned as political actors, but he is not primarily concerned with how religious ideas and faith functioned in society or politics more generally. (Adolphson had enough to write about in the contexts he does address, but the other dimensions constitute a significant deficit in premodern Japanese historical studies that needs to be addressed more fully.) . . .


There are about 596 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.