You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 299 words from this article are provided below; about 491 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.4 | The History Cooperative
106.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Asia



Naureen Talha. Economic Factors in the Making of Pakistan (1921–1947). New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. Pp. x, 220. $26.95.

"It's the economy, stupid!" This political catch phrase summarizes Naureen Talha's central argument. Talha describes how the Muslims of colonial South Asia came increasingly to see themselves as an economically backward community: a community, moreover, whose minority status seemed to them to assure their continued backwardness in a postcolonial state within which Hindus would comprise the majority of the population. The solution, Muslims came to believe, was an independent Pakistan wherein Muslims would control their economic future. Why and how this belief emerged and significantly intensified is the focus of this book, itself a revision of Talha's Ph.D. thesis. 1
     Talha builds her argument in six short chapters plus a brief introduction and conclusion; the complete text and chapter endnotes total a slender 162 pages, followed by 30 pages of tabular material presented in a series of appendixes. The first chapter covers the period from 1857 to 1921 and shows how Muslims began to recognize and then to respond politically to the fact that their community had become underrepresented, relative to its population size, in education and government employment in most parts of India. Chapters two and three describe the attempts of the Muslim leadership to improve the economic position of Muslims (in government service, in the independent professions, and in trade and industry) in the period 1921–1935, within a political framework that did not, for most leaders, require a divided India as the necessary step to safeguard and advance Muslim economic interests. However, because of some Muslim advances in education during this period, Talha does argue that Muslims' perception of their economic backwardness and the role Hindus played in that backwardness increased. . . .


There are about 491 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.