You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 316 words from this article are provided below; about 576 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.4 | The History Cooperative
106.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Comparative/World



Irvine Loudon. The Tragedy of Childbed Fever. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. Pp. xiii, 236.

Although not a new disease, puerperal fever, a severe, extraordinarily painful, and often fatal peritonitis of postpartum women, acquired a new visibility with the development of lying-in hospitals in late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century Europe. It was a good deal rarer in fact than in the imaginations of novelists, for whom it has been a deus ex machina of inestimable value. Even in bad situations, the mortality rate over time was usually well less than one percent of deliveries, far lower than typical infant mortality rates. But cases were not evenly distributed in space or time. Often they came as epidemics, affecting a single town, hospital building, or the practice of a particular midwife. What in retrospect has seemed clear evidence of contagion has led to a prominent place for the disease in popular histories of the germ theory, which focus on the heroic struggles of the Hungarian obstetrician Ignaz Semmelweis against the callous stupidity of the staff at Vienna's huge Allegemeines Krankenhaus or the exceptional clarity of mind of that elite Bostonian, Oliver Wendell Holmes. 1
     Following his magisterial work, Death in Childbirth (1992), Irvine Loudon here offers an interpretation of the response to the disease that is better informed both by pathological theories of the past and by modern knowledge of the Group A Streptococcus, the causal agent of the disease. The work opens with the 1797 death of Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, following the birth of a daughter who would later write Frankenstein (1819), and takes the story through the appearance, in the mid-1930s, of the sulfa drugs that could finally cure the disease. A final chapter examines the epidemiology of infection by this variety of streptococcus, which is associated with erysipelas and necrotizing fasciitis when it infects other parts of body. . . .


There are about 576 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.