You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 253 words from this article are provided below; about 512 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Walter F. Pratt, Jr. The Supreme Court under Edward Douglass White, 1910–1921. (Chief Justiceships of the United States Supreme Court.) Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. 1999. Pp. xx, 296. $39.95.

The practice of using chief justices to define periods in Supreme Court history is an imperfect device at best, and to his credit Walter F. Pratt, Jr. does not try to inflate the significance of his thoughtful study. "I cannot argue," he tells us, "that the White Court crafted a distinctive identity for itself" (p. xviii). Instead, he seeks to explore the gradual and nuanced processes of judicial change as the Court moved from the problems and assumptions of nineteenth-century jurisprudence to those of the twentieth. 1
     Pratt adopts a chronological approach, examining in sequence each of the eleven terms over which Edward Douglass White presided. He seeks to capture the general flavor of each: relevant social and political background, contributions of individual justices, the size and content of the docket, and the Court's ordinary as well as famous cases. The advantages and disadvantages of the approach are apparent. On the positive side, it roots the Court firmly in a slowly evolving context and suggests a variety of possible interconnections between its decisions and contemporaneous but doctrinally unrelated matters, whether internal or external to the Court. On the negative side, it tends to obscure major developments and to diffuse Pratt's general arguments. Such an approach demands a substantial concluding chapter which, unfortunately, is lacking. . . .


There are about 512 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.