You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 237 words from this article are provided below; about 562 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Jeffrey Robert Young. Domesticating Slavery: The Master Class in Georgia and South Carolina, 1670–1837. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1999. Pp. xii, 336. Cloth $49.95, paper $18.95.

This ambitious and eclectic work attempts to reconcile competing interpretations of the Old South by demonstrating that "corporate individualism," which combined elements of capitalism, bourgeois domesticity, and paternalism, was the ideology around which the southern planter class cohered in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. According to Jeffrey Robert Young, the same transatlantic markets in capital and culture that spawned abolitionism also furnished South Carolina and Georgia planters with the reasons and the means to formulate and disseminate an aggressive defense of slavery. Planters cast slavery in familial terms, drawing heavily on bourgeois language of individual rights and domesticity, while at the same time emphasizing the claims of society on the individual and delimiting the rights of subordinate members of households. In a momentous, protracted act of collective self-deception (Young declares at one point that "slaveowners were in deep denial" [p. 174]), slaveholders convinced themselves and most other white southerners that African slavery was a respectable—even an admirable and indispensable—institution, one that protected the rights and promoted the happiness of all individuals according to their race, gender, and station. The ideology of corporate individualism legitimated planter rule in the South and, ultimately, justified the quest for southern independence. . . .


There are about 562 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.