You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 345 words from this article are provided below; about 577 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.4 | The History Cooperative
105.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Matthew Frye Jacobson. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Paperback edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1999. Pp. x, 338. $16.95.

The aim of this book by Matthew Frye Jacobson is to trace how immigrants to the U.S. from various parts of Europe were constituted as members of the same race. The author is guided by two premises: first, that race is central to the history of his subjects, and second, that it is a product not of nature but of politics and culture. He divides the history of whiteness into three epochs. The first begins in 1790 and runs to about 1840. The 1790 law limiting naturalization to "free white persons" was passed at a moment when color stood out as a mark of status: the only chattel slaves were of African descent, the only "savages" were the indigenous peoples, and most of the rest were British-descended Christians (of the reformed sort). The law expressed the consensus among legislators that geographic origin, religion, nationality, physical type, civilization, republicanism, and fitness for self-government were linked, and for a half-century it presented few problems to those in power. 1
     The second epoch begins in the 1840s with the massive waves of Irish and German immigration and runs to 1924. During that period, as a result of the new infusions, internal divisions among whites came to the fore, and the monolithic white race of the previous period was fractured into hierarchically ordered distinct white races: Celts, Teutons, Slavs, Hebrews, Mediterraneans, Anglo-Saxons, and so forth. According to Jacobson, it is anachronistic to apply the modem notion of culturally based ethnicity to that phenomenon; Catholicism was biology, and biology was destiny. Races existed on a continuum, and Anglo-Saxons were set off against Irish as well as against Mexicans. But in a period of volatile and contested racial meanings, the logic of Chinese exclusion and imperialism pointed toward the amalgamation of all whites, even as the eugenics movement pointed to the exclusion of some. . . .


There are about 577 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.