You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 277 words from this article are provided below; about 548 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.3 | The History Cooperative
105.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Methods/Theory



Daniel Gasman. Haeckel's Monism and the Birth of Fascist Ideology. (Studies in Modern European History, number 33.) New York: Peter Lang. 1998. Pp. viii, 482. $69.95.

Just when it seemed that every possible source for the origins of fascist ideology had been examined, Daniel Gasman proposes a new candidate for the role of fascist intellectual godfather in the person of Ernst Haeckel, the late nineteenth-century biologist and zoologist. According to Gasman, who, if nothing else, is not afraid to take sweeping positions, Haeckel is not just the key thinker in the development of fascism. He is the crucial inspiration of much of modern art, including symbolist poetry, the works of Paul Gaugin, Henri Matisse, and Edvard Munch, and Art Nouveau. As one might expect, positivist and Social Darwinist thinkers are also indebted to Haeckel, but Gasman argues that even antipositivists like Georges Sorel and the Italian modernists Giuseppe Prezzolini and Giovanni Papini based their thinking on Haeckel's theories. 1
     Haeckel argued that one single evolutionary force guided all nature including man and that it would provide the basis for all social laws. He resolutely rejected Enlightenment rationalism and any kind of transcendental dualism, especially Judeo-Christian theology, in favor of a strict monism that bound human history to the laws of nature and individuals to the larger racial or ethnic group. He stressed that instinctual and primitive impulses, not individual rational choice and intelligence, guided human history. He fused this with an almost mystical vision of monism as a kind of secular religion that negated human progress and called for man's acceptance of the primitive and subordination to powerful natural forces. . . .


There are about 548 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.