You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 168 words from this article are provided below; about 593 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.2 | The History Cooperative
105.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



J. Morgan Kousser. Colorblind Injustice: Minority Voting Rights and the Undoing of the Second Reconstruction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1999. Pp. x, 590. Cloth $65.00, paper $29.95.

J. Morgan Kousser concludes his study of voting rights legislation and litigation by noting the historian's duty "to set the story straight" (p. 467). The Supreme Court has built historical concerns into its voting rights jurisprudence, and Kousser insists that applying that jurisprudence well demands that courts rely on good historical practice as determined by historians' standards. 1
     According to the Supreme Court, laws whose purpose is to exclude voters because of their race are unconstitutional, and laws defining electoral districts are unconstitutional if race was the predominant factor in drawing district lines. Kousser devotes one chapter to identifying ten factors courts should use to determine purpose and motivation. Notably, these factors are what good historians would use in writing narratives attempting to account for a law's enactment. . . .


There are about 593 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.