You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 272 words from this article are provided below; about 571 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.1 | The History Cooperative
105.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Katherine M. B. Osburn. Southern Ute Women: Autonomy and Assimilation on the Reservation, 1887–1934. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 1998. Pp. xiv, 165. Cloth $45.00, paper $19.95.

In her brief, informative work on Southern Ute women from 1887 to 1934, Katherine M. B. Osburn argues that they selectively accommodated and resisted assimilation efforts undertaken by the Office of Indian Affairs (OIA) and various benevolent organizations. Although the OIA succeeded in virtually every assimilation initiative, including the alteration of subsistence activities, political structures, residential patterns, educational responsibilities, marriage customs, and gender roles, Osburn nevertheless concludes that Southern Ute women maintained a high degree of status and power. She notes that after the formation of the reservation and the subsequent allotment of tribal land, women continued to be essential in the production of food, clothing, shelter, and children. Just as their productive and reproductive importance granted them equal status in the early part of the nineteenth century, the instability of the Ute economy continued to reinforce gender equity and thus undermined the OIA's effort to impose a gendered society. 1
     In the assimilation period, according to Osburn, interactions between Utes and the OIA reshaped the culture of each. Rather than passively acquiescing to the dictates of assimilation policies, Ute women actively participated in change, and in the process, modified those around them. Osburn surveys Southern Ute women's experiences in public leadership, economics, homemaking, sex, and marriage, identifying examples of female autonomy and influence. By comparing women's and men's responses to assimilation policies and programs, she brings the customs and attitudes of women into greater focus. . . .


There are about 571 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.