You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 543 words from this article are provided below; about 631 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 104.4 | The History Cooperative
104.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 1999
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Harold D. Langley. A History of Medicine in the Early U.S. Navy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1995. Pp. xix, 435. $49.95.

This insightful study traces the history of medical practice in the U.S. Navy from 1794 to 1842. These dates mark the construction of the first American naval vessels, including the U.S.S. Constitution, and the establishment of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. Harold D. Langley is a former curator of naval history at the National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution, and the author of important contributions to naval history. Research for the study was drawn from a wide variety of sources, since the U.S. Navy medical records for this period are not gathered in a single collection. In fact, medical records before 1842 were rarely collected at all. This fact makes it difficult to understand not only the practice of medicine but also its practitioners. What Langley has accomplished in light of this handicap is a tribute to his determination and patience and the assistance of others recognized in more than five pages of acknowledgments. 1
     The book consists of seventeen chapters that interweave the history of naval medicine with that of the development of the newly created U.S. Navy and the emergence of the American state. The quasi-war with France (1798–1801), the Barbary Wars, and the War of 1812 receive special attention because of the medical needs of a wartime navy. Langley's account of the period after 1812 strikes a different tone, emphasizing more the creation of a professional service and the institutionalization of health care through reform efforts. The establishment of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery forty-eight years after the creation of naval surgeons and mates in 1794 was a defining moment in the history of naval medicine. Readers will find instructive Langley's explanation for the reorganization of the navy at that time. Much of the impetus was due to several scathing articles published between April 1840 and June 1841 in the Southern Literary Messenger by Lt. Matthew Fontaine Maury, writing under the pen name of Harry Bluff. His criticisms of the navy included the practice of medicine. Ship captains could limit medicines taken aboard their vessels, driving some surgeons to list their supplies in Latin to avoid scrutiny. Maury proposed that a navy medical bureau be established. The election of 1840 swept out the Democrats and brought in the Whig William Henry Harrison as president. Virginian Abel Parker Upshur was made secretary of the navy and recommended a restructuring of the navy to Congress. By August 1842 the House and Senate approved the plan with amendments, and it was signed by President John Tyler. 2
     Langley's examination of the early practice of naval medicine contains some enlightening and shocking revelations. Foremost is the ponderous movement of bureaucracies, most notably the Navy Department, which could not produce a decision on the means to provide care and treatment for wounded and infirm sailors. No permanent naval hospital was built until 1830. Six years earlier, examinations to qualify medical officers were established by navy doctors. Professionalism was further enhanced by the establishment of the medical school in Philadelphia linked to the Medical Institute and the University of Pennsylvania. . . .


There are about 631 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.