You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 287 words from this article are provided below; about 551 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 104.4 | The History Cooperative
104.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 1999
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Methods/Theory



Alon Confino. The Nation as a Local Metaphor: Württemberg, Imperial Germany, and National Memory, 1871–1918. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1997. Pp. xiii, 280.

Germany has long been a land of distinct regions, as a quick glance at a historical atlas will show. Yet the exact place of these diverse localities in German nationalism is only now being explored. The publication of Alon Confino's stimulating study, based on Württemberg in Germany's southwest, follows Celia Applegate's fine work on the western Palatinate, A Nation of Provincials: The German Idea of Heimat (1990), and greatly enriches our understanding of this complex relationship. 1
     Confino's concern is to explore the way Württembergers came to relate ideas about their own specific region to wider concepts of Germany after Otto von Bismarck's forcible creation of a single nation-state between 1866 and 1871. Like Applegate, Confino traces connections among the intimate space of the local community, that of the province or region, and the larger, more abstract, but no less real national sphere. The preservation of partially autonomous states like Württemberg, Bavaria, and Saxony, each of which retained its own ruling dynasty, political system, and administration after 1871, institutionalized regional diversity within the new German Empire. These states provided intermediate focal points for a host of lesser localities, all of which had a distinct sense of their own identity. As Confino argues, however, there was no simple, linear progression from the local to the national, nor from the tangible to the abstract. Instead, the local and national were interwoven in a shifting pattern that eventually merged local, regional, and national identities in a single representation of the nation by the time of World War I. . . .


There are about 551 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.