You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 249 words from this article are provided below; about 575 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5 | The History Cooperative
106.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory


Catherine Julien. Reading Inca History. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. 2000. Pp. xi, 338. $49.95.

Posed implicitly in the title and mutually dependent, the two major questions asked in this study are: is there such a thing as Inca history, and can it be known to or by us? The answers are affirmative in each case, persuasively so, thanks to new and well-managed scholarship and lucid exposition. 1
     In announcing her purpose and method, Catherine Julien compares her work with that of such predecessors as John Howland Rowe, her long-time mentor, and R. Tom Zuidema, whose synchronic approach she generally eschews. She believes that the Inca can be shown to have had a historical consciousness of their own; that this consciousness informed a variety of records left by them; and that a sense of these Inca records can be had through careful comparison and analysis of narratives in Spanish into which they were incorporated. The comparisons between the Spanish texts in question are extensive and come to involve the reader intimately, set out as they are in double columns. Fundamental to the corresponding analysis is the literary notion of genre: that is, sequences of narrative that can be cross-located through presence or absence, chief among them being life-history and military campaigns. These last she relates to Inca models, notably the quipu or knotted-string device that served as writing for the Inca. (The Spaniards spoke of—and burned—whole "libraries" [bibliotecas] of quipus.) . . .


There are about 575 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.