You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 219 words from this article are provided below; about 562 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.1 | The History Cooperative
105.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Methods/Theory



Randall Collins. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1998. Pp. xix, 1098. $49.95.

Randall Collins's purpose in this book is to articulate a theoretical framework for understanding the history of philosophy. As the title suggests, his approach is sociological: he sees the functioning of intellectual communities as a special case of the interaction rituals that Erving Goffman found everywhere in social life, with ideas functioning as "intellectual sacred objects" that define the solidarity and distinctiveness of a group. "The distinctive interaction rituals (IRs) of intellectuals are those occasions on which intellectuals come together for the sake of their serious talk: not to socialize, nor to be practical" (p. 27). Collins notes that, in taking this position, he is implicitly rejecting a rival view that sees the solitary activity of reading and writing as the distinguishing marks of intellectual activity. Although he sees lectures and texts as "chained together," a fact contributing to the distinctiveness of the intellectual community compared to "any other kind of social activity" (p. 27), he argues that "without face-to-face rituals, writings and ideas would never be charged up with emotional energy; they would be Durkheimian emblems of a dead religion, whose worshippers never came to ceremonies" (p. 27). . . .


There are about 562 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.