You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 190 words from this article are provided below; about 355 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 34.1 | The History Cooperative
34.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Reconstructing Fort Union By John Matzko. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001. xiv + 231 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00; £31.96.)

     Reconstructing Fort Union is a story that proves the old adage that "all politics is local" In this story,, individuals dedicated to the remembrance of an outpost of the far-flung American Fur Company empire pass the torch from one to another in hopes of marshaling local heritage and economic interests while trying to find a patron to underwrite the realization of their dream to see this fort rebuilt. Once that voice is found, the story becomes an object lesson on how to put political pressure on a government agency to make it do something that its own policies say it should never do. 1
    Fort Union was never the center of national attention. Yet, as a regional center for the commercial interests of the American Fur Company it played a role in the United States's contact with, and later destruction of, Native peoples. When its location and the resources it was built to exploit lost their importance, it was quickly dispensed with. . . .


There are about 355 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.