You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 171 words from this article are provided below; about 439 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.2 | The History Cooperative
94.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Popular Eugenics: National Efficiency and American Mass Culture in the 1930s. Ed. by Susan Currell and Christina Cogdell. (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2006. x, 406 pp. Cloth, $69.95, ISBN 978-0-8214-1691-4. Paper, $28.95, ISBN 978-0-8214-1692-1.)

Conventional narratives about eugenics in the United States argue that the movement was in decline in the 1930s, with biologists and anthropologists judging the movement as bad science. Popular Eugenics, edited by Susan Currell and Christina Cogdell, presents fourteen essays demonstrating that eugenic rhetoric still held a prominent place in public imagination despite its reputation among scientists. After the heights of the 1920s, most eugenicists softened their focus on biological determinism to accommodate the influence of environmental factors in reproduction, but authors, artists, and designers continued to employ forceful narratives of reproductive declension and self-improvement in their work. Divided into two sections, one on popular writing and one on visual culture, the collection provides a much-needed look at eugenics in popular culture that will balance the overemphasis on science in eugenic history. . . .

There are about 439 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.