You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 183 words from this article are provided below; about 401 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Constitution in Congress: Descent into the Maelstrom, 1829–1861. By David P. Currie. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. xviii, 322 pp. $55.00, ISBN 0-226-12916-0.)

This latest volume in the University of Chicago law professor David P. Currie's sweeping history of extrajudicial constitutional argument continues the series's earlier perspectives, style, and coverage through the great congressional debates over slavery, expansion, and sectionalism that led to the American Civil War. Divided into three parts—on the antislavery petition controversy, diplomacy and expansion, and slavery (the last melodramatically titled "The Evil Empire")—the book moves through a maze of constitutional argumentation by Congress and the executive branch on a tremendous range of issues. (Lamentably, the states, themselves participants in extrajudicial constitutional interpretation with a deep stake in the slavery issue, are defined out of the study's coverage.) The author aims at the specialist reader with some legal background, adopting an eclectic approach to constitutional history that occasionally ignores important scholarship (such as William Wiecek's The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, 1760–1848, 1977) and mixing dense legal commentary with a glib style. . . .

There are about 401 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.