You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 164 words from this article are provided below; about 439 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Supreme Court, 1837–1857. By Austin Allen. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2006. xii, 274 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 0-8203-2653-4. Paper, $22.95, ISBN 0-8203-2842-1.)

When considering Roger B. Taney, one has to confront the contrast between the justice who wrote the Charles River Bridge opinion in 1837 and the justice who wrote the opinion in the Dred Scott case twenty years later. Austin Allen proposes that Taney's modernizing, pro-corporate attitudes shaped his arguments about slavery, and that this explains the ruling in the Dred Scott case. In making his argument, Allen seeks to move beyond what he calls the "orthodoxy" that focuses on the sectional divide over slavery. Instead, Allen wants to present the case as an expression of developing legal doctrine rather than of extrajudicial politics. This is old-fashioned court-centered legal history, and Allen presents a reading of Taney's opinion that is at least charitable, and, at points, downright sympathetic. . . .

There are about 439 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.