You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 235 words from this article are provided below; about 444 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life and Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father. Ed. by Douglas Ambrose and Robert W. T. Martin. (New York: New York University Press, 2006. x, 300 pp. $45.00, ISBN 978-0-81477-0714-2.)

Despite his elitist mistrust of democracy, many associate Alexander Hamilton with modernity. They point to his financial program, support for manufacturing, and apparent endorsement of social mobility and economic opportunity. Some contributors to this volume agree. Barry Alan Shain places Publius in a tradition of liberal political theory and argues that "his" essays endorsed a culture of individualism. John Patrick Diggins argues that Hamilton anticipated Abraham Lincoln; both were self-made men who prized mobility and opportunity, and they sought an open economic system that allowed people to rise as high as their talents allowed. 1
      Essays by Robert W. T. Martin, Colleen A. Sheehan, and Carey Roberts provide, I believe, a more reliable discussion of Hamilton's ideas. They argue that Hamilton placed deep faith in a natural aristocracy and a hierarchical social order. He believed that republics were naturally disorderly, and "the solution to classic problems of republicanism was not a closer connection to the demos but a great reliance on the ambitions of the elite ... still generally thought of in terms of hereditary social and economic status, even if it now incorporated an aristocracy of merit ... " (p. 117). . . .

There are about 444 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.