You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 145 words from this article are provided below; about 357 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.2 | The History Cooperative
93.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier. By Stuart Banner. (Cambridge: Belknap, 2005. 344 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-674-01871-0.)

How the Indians Lost Their Land begins with a basic question that students often pose: Did the first people sell their land, or was it taken from them? To find the answer Stuart Banner explored the origins of colonial British land policy and followed the trail into the early twentieth century. In contrast to the historiographical convention stating that the English justified their claim to North America by right of conquest, Banner distinguished between rights of sovereignty to govern the land and rights of property to own it. While early English settlers expected legitimate land use to involve dense permanent habitations, they nonetheless recognized aboriginal horticulture, settlement, and government as proper markers of ownership, but not necessarily of sovereignty. . . .

There are about 357 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.