You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 280 words from this article are provided below; about 729 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.3 | The History Cooperative
92.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Israel on the Appomattox: A Southern Experiment in Black Freedom from the 1790s through the Civil War. By Melvin Patrick Ely. (New York: Knopf, 2004. x, 640 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-679-44738-5.)

At my oral qualifying examination, I fielded a question about the direction of southern history by predicting boldly that local histories would predominate in the next decade or so. As with so many such claims for the future proffered, however confidently, by those trained to study the past, I was wrong. Dead wrong. If anything, the soured job market of the late 1990s and the narrowed avenue to gaining recognition in the publishing business have convinced historians that they must think bigger rather than smaller so as to avoid the stigma of being limited. 1
      Of course, those who have hefted the yoke of smallness know well that such logic is sorely flawed. To accomplish a local study requires the historian to sift through the mounds of minutiae in these often sleepy, seemingly inconsequential locales, first to master the characteristics of the particular community's life and then to measure it against the broader story, regional or national. Thus the task of the local tale well told forces the historian to defy easy categorization by assuming responsibility for all of the profession's subspecialties, becoming social, cultural, economic, political, material, and gender historian as well as biographer and genealogist, all at once, a griot, as it were, in order to understand the subject of her or his inquiry. And the historian has then to convince those skeptical historians who dismiss local history as parochial that this is a story of consequence. So much for being limited. . . .

There are about 729 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.