You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 192 words from this article are provided below; about 385 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Without Benefit of Clergy: Women and the Pastoral Relationship in Nineteenth-Century American Culture. By Karin E. Gedge. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. viii, 290 pp. $49.95, ISBN 0-19-513020-0.)

For twenty-five years Ann Douglas's The Feminization of American Culture (1977) has remained the great straw man of American cultural history. No matter how many historians have challenged her thesis that the rigor and richness of American religion were vitiated by its increasing association with women, she remains the opponent to whom every one wants to give the final knockout blow. Karin E. Gedge's book, Without Benefit of Clergy, is not a knockout blow, but it provides a great deal of hard evidence contradicting Douglas's arguments. 1
      Gedge argues that Douglas and subsequent scholars essentially recapitulate the nineteenth century's long-standing anxiety that ministers and women might grow too close, thus violating the proper division between male and female spheres. Instead of increasing ideological alignment between women and the clergy, Gedge finds deepening tensions and conflicting interests, stemming largely from the imposition of strict gender roles on a relationship that by its nature must include much male-female contact. . . .

There are about 385 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.