You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 203 words from this article are provided below; about 430 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Blood & Irony: Southern White Women's Narratives of the Civil War, 1861–1937. By Sarah E. Gardner. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. x, 341 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8078-2818-1.)

Over the course of the last thirty years, several historians have sought to make sense of the lost cause—a regional mythology created by white southerners to interpret Confederate defeat and describe their ideal of the pre–Civil War South. Few have sought to examine the ways in which this regional narrative became the national story of the war. Sarah E. Gardner's Blood & Irony, therefore, is a welcome addition to this literature, as it seeks to make that connection through an examination of southern white women's narratives of the war. 1
      Gardner takes a chronological approach to her subject, beginning with narratives, both published and unpublished, written in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, and examines the trajectory of white women's fictionalized accounts of the period through 1937 with the publication of the best known of all Civil War novels, Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind. Through their war stories, Gardner argues, southern white women "created a new cultural identity for the postbellum South" (p. 11). . . .

There are about 430 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.