You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 135 words from this article are provided below; about 357 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. By Nils Gilman. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003. xiv, 329 pp. $48.00, ISBN 0-8018-7399-1.)

Late in life, Dean Acheson recalled the years from 1940 to 1953 as a time of "great obscurity" in which the future was clouded by the sudden disappearance of the certainties of the imperial world order. Amid Cold War perils, Americans struggled to fashion defensive lines in this "unknown world" of new nations, poverty, and revolution (Acheson, Present at the Creation, 1969, pp. 4–5). Social scientists labored through the 1950s to fill this conceptual void, and the result more than met expectations. Modernization theory combined national self-interest, academic empire building, and exceptionalist myth making into an unbeatable nation-building strategy, just in time for the 1960s. . . .

There are about 357 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.