You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 200 words from this article are provided below; about 337 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.3 | The History Cooperative
91.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Lone Star Rising: The Revolutionary Birth of the Texas Republic. By William C. Davis. (New York: Free Press, 2004. xii, 354 pp. $27.00, ISBN 0-684-86510-6.)

Lone Star Rising by William C. Davis is a throwback to a time when history books were judged by how well they were written, not how accurately they interpreted the past. Davis writes of heroes, not people; he relies on stereotypes instead of taking the time to deal with complexities. He tosses aside all recent scholarship to recreate a Disney-like interpretation of the Texas war for independence. 1
      Throughout the book, Davis makes sweeping statements that are, at best, misleading. For example, "all of the vast empire north and west of the settled area [of Texas in 1800] was the home ground of the feared Comanche" (p. 3). There were many Indian groups in that area, and not all feared the Comanches. Davis displays his complete ignorance of Spanish Indian policy when he declares that "The native population was simply swept aside, eradicated or enslaved" (p. 10). His bibliography of Spanish-era Texas is laughably inadequate—he obviously has not read the award-winning Spanish Texas, 1519–1821, by Donald E. Chipman (1992). . . .

There are about 337 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.