You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 191 words from this article are provided below; about 430 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Movie Review | The Journal of American History, 90.3 | The History Cooperative
90.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Movie Reviews



Let's Get Married. Prod. by Ben Loeterman. Frontline with Ben Loeterman Productions, Inc., 2002. 60 mins. (PBS Video, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1698; 800-344-3337; <shop@pbs.org>; <http://shop.pbs.org/education/> [Sept. 15, 2003])

This Frontline episode explores the contemporary marriage movement promoted by evangelical Christians, a handful of prominent social scientists, and elected officials, including the current resident of the White House. From George W. Bush on down, proponents of premarital celibacy and marriage education charge that wedlock has been endangered by developments that significantly undercut the naturalness and necessity of male breadwinning and female dependence. 1
      The typical story they tell is that the marital cornerstone of civilization has been besieged by antireligious forces associated with cultural liberalism—including the sexual revolution, women's economic autonomy, and ideologies such as "children's rights"—in ascendance since the 1960s. Yet conservatives have had a decisive voice in debates about marriage during the entire period since the second wave of feminism emerged. They portray marriage as a fragile institution that is simultaneously powerful enough to advance cherished policy goals: welfare reform and the moral rehabilitation of the American populace are favorites. . . .

There are about 430 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.