You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 343 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Movie Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Movie Review


The Grapes of Wrath. Prod. by Ricki Green. Cronkite Ward Co. and the Discovery Channel, 2001. 51 mins. (Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Box 2053, Princeton, NJ 08543-2053; 1-800-257-5126; <custserv@films.com>; <http://www.films.com> [Sept. 23, 2002])

John Steinbeck once wrote to his editors, perhaps hyperbolically, that his novel The Grapes of Wrath (1939) had five layers in it. This documentary, which focuses on the book, Steinbeck, and depression-era migrants, successfully explores several of those layers. At one level, The Grapes of Wrath was a social document that outraged management groups such as the Associated Farmers of California, while it suggested, at least at one point, that the Okies' wrath could spill over into revolution. But the author's son, Thom Steinbeck, convincingly argues that his father was not really interested in fomenting or leading a class war, disappointing those who thought the author was down in the trenches with them. In fact, Thom says, the book "cost [his father] so much personally," as he lost his anonymity and became the target of criticism, that Steinbeck was never the same after its publication. Nonetheless, as Charles Shindo points out in his book Dust Bowl Migrants in the American Imagination (1997), raising the social consciousness of the liberal middle class, if not the awareness of the Okies, was one purpose of the work. . . .


There are about 343 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.