You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 208 words from this article are provided below; about 373 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Howard L. Reiter | Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.4 | The History Cooperative
87.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Political Parties and Constitutional Government: Remaking American Democracy. By Sidney M. Milkis. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. xii, 228 pp. Cloth, $49.50, ISBN 0-8018-6194-2. Paper, $17.95, ISBN 0-8108-6195-0.)

In The President and the Parties (1993), Sidney M. Milkis introduced a reinterpretation of the decline of partisanship in twentieth-century America. In place of the usual focus on public opinion and such factors as technology, media, and social mobility, Milkis attributed party decline primarily to political entrepreneurship. In that version, Franklin D. Roosevelt and, to a lesser extent, his successors sought to replace partisan regimes with an administrative state constructed upon an expanded understanding of political entitlements. In the process, citizen participation and democratic accountability have become attenuated. 1
     In his new book, which combines greater concision with a broader historical sweep, Milkis has extended his argument through American political history. Nineteenth-century political parties rendered national politics accountable to states and localities and engaged the energies of the common people. In the early twentieth century, the Progressive movement sought to cure the excesses of party machines by building an administrative state subject only to public opinion and not to local partisans. They had mixed success, however, as Woodrow Wilson chose to govern as a partisan president. . . .


There are about 373 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.