You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 224 words from this article are provided below; about 531 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.3 | The History Cooperative
87.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



We Are Not What We Seem: Black Nationalism and Class Struggle in the American Century. By Rod Bush. (New York: New York University Press, 1999. xvi, 315 pp. $32.50, isbn 0-8147-1317-3.)

Rod Bush's We Are Not What We Seem is a wonderfully idiosyncratic tour through a plethora of twentieth-century African American movements. It is an activist's meditation on one strain of African American radicalism. Unfortunately, the core of that radicalism is never adequately explained. We Are Not What We Seem is not programmatic. Indeed, one of its unintended benefits is that it indicates the various meanings and projects that have attached themselves to the term "black nationalism." 1
     Bush takes on a number of current public intellectuals, among them Henry Louis Gates and Cornell West. He cites the former as providing no critique of liberalism and the latter for seeing the justified rage of black youth as nothing more than nihilism. One of the points on which the book does strike home is in its analysis of Marcus Garvey and Garveyism. Bush realizes, as few have, that Garvey had a class analysis far in advance of many of his more intellectual black compeers. It was Garvey, not W. E. B. Du Bois, who saw the class problems inherent in North American ghettos and in African states such as Liberia and Ethiopia. . . .


There are about 531 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.