You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 237 words from this article are provided below; about 433 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 11.4 | The History Cooperative
11.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2006
Previous
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Book Review


George W. Bush's Healthy Forests: Reframing the Environmental Debate. By Jacqueline Vaughn and Hanna J. Cortner. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2005. xii + 231 pp. Notes, index. Paper $24.95.

In August, 2002, President George W. Bush flew to southern Oregon, where the largest wildfire of the year was still smoldering, to announce what he called a "common sense policy" to prevent massive forest fires. His "Healthy Forests Initiative" (HFI) included a number of measures with a single stated objective: to remove the dry dead wood and understory that turns western forests into tinderboxes. It was simple, he insisted: "If you let kindling build up, and there's a lightning strike, you're going to get yourself a big fire." 1
      The situation was far more complex, contend J. Vaughn and H. Cortner in their insightful study, George W. Bush's Healthy Forests. The president's solution to forest fires was even more convoluted—intentionally so, claim the authors. The massive thinning project the president had in mind would not take place in the forest but in the federal regulatory process. It is a system that, depending on your politics, protects the environment from rapacious industries, or allows eco-extremists to bring the engines of progress to a halt. What's more, argue Vaughn and Cortner, the president intended to use HFI as an opening to "reframe ... the entire environmental policy agenda" of the nation (p. 2). . . .

There are about 433 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.