| Book Review | Environmental History, 11.2

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 626 words from this article are provided below; about 560 words remain.

If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:: • get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).
Instititutions can:: • get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | Environmental History, 11.2 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

EDITOR'S NOTE

A retrospective review highlights an important contribution to the field of environmental history, and this new look at Arthur McEvoy's The Fisherman's Problem by Joseph E. Taylor III is no exception. But more importantly, both Taylor and the reviewer of the next book, Michael Reidy, independently point to the paucity of environmental history scholarship on the oceans and the need for a broader perspective that includes water environments. Readers can look forward to a series of full-length articles devoted to marine and freshwater environments beginning with the July issue of the journal.

MELISSA WIEDENFELD

RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

The Fisherman's Problem: Ecology and Law in the California Fisheries, 1850–1980. By Arthur F. McEvoy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
As part of an effort to assess the legacies of several path-breaking works in environmental history, I was asked to write a retrospective review of Arthur McEvoy's The Fisherman's Problem. It was a pleasant task. The primary impression, even after nearly twenty years, is that this book remains among the most important works in the field. It has long been a model of interdisciplinary research, and little wonder that it was the first recipient of ASEH's George Perkins Marsh Prize. Merging science, legal, and social history, The Fisherman's Problem is a compelling study of the social and ecological reorganization of California's fisheries from contact to the federal restructuring of management in the 1980s. Few works match it in sophistication, yet few seem more lauded and less read. It is troubling that a book so relevant should be so obscure, and making sense of that legacy casts bothersome light on our field's strengths and weaknesses.	1
At the heart of this study is the metaphor of the fisherman's problem, a conceptual framework that refines Garrett Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" to suggest the conundrum of a regulatory system that was far better at finding and exploiting resources than at protecting nature. McEvoy's approach also helps explain why management agencies never have been able to deal with the complexities of stochastic nature. Yet unlike Hardin, McEvoy is loyal to the contingencies of time and place. California was not an idealized New England commons but a messy collision of cultures, often evoking very ugly impulses, in an environment best likened to a shimmering target. Throughout he emphasizes the contingent "interdependence between ecological, economic, and social processes" (p. 257), and the inability of institutions to perceive what he calls elsewhere the connections between "ecology, production, and cognition" (Environmental Review 11: 287–305). These insights seem equally important for historians. The inclination to stress one factor above others, to focus on the parts rather than the interplay, seems as wrong-headed for our profession as for natural resource managers.	2
By taking the interplay seriously, McEvoy broached historical problems that only more recently gained much attention. Abalone, anchovies, crab, mackerel, salmon, sardines, shrimp, and tuna help reveal not only how dynamic nature vexed fishers, managers, and scientists, but how responses to unpredictability produced social and ecological harm. McEvoy was one of the first to argue that progressive conservationists did not invent resource management, and that conservationists' efforts often produced what we now call environmental injustice. His treatment of Yurok salmon fishers, Chinese shrimpers, and Italian crabbers foreshadowed such works as Louis Warren's The Hunter's Game (Yale, 1997), Mark Spence's Dispossessing the Wilderness (Oxford, 1999), and Karl Jacoby's Crimes Against Nature (California, 2001). Similarly, his analysis of the tensions between nature, science, and the state influenced Nancy Langston's Forest Dreams, Forest Nightmares (Washington, 1995), and Matthew Evenden's Fish Versus Power (Cambridge, 2004). If the measure of a work is how it shapes other scholars, then The Fisherman's Problem will get high marks for many years to come.	. . .

There are about 560 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.