You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 174 words from this article are provided below; about 465 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.1 | The History Cooperative
110.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2005
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Max M. Edling. A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State. New York: Oxford University Press. 2003. Pp. xii, 333. $35.00.

Twentieth-century studies of the making of the U.S. Constitution commonly identified its sources and the conflict over its adoption with a clash between competing economic interests or an effort by a troubled national elite to put a brake on populistic forces in the revolutionary states, restore direction of the nation by a "better sort" of men, and safeguard private rights and long-term public needs against majority excesses. As the century turned, however, Peter Onuf, Roger Brown, David Hendrickson, Karl Walling, and other scholars called for a renewed attention to the problems of the union as a union. Max M. Edling's book is a valuable addition to this recent work, building on the past three decades' studies of the eighteenth-century British state and its internal critics to construct a novel framework for this story. . . .

There are about 465 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.