You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 212 words from this article are provided below; about 559 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 110.1 | The History Cooperative
110.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2005
Previous
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review

Methods and Theory



Tracy C. Davis and Thomas Postlewait, editors. Theatricality. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pp. xi, 243. Cloth $55.00, paper $20.00.

To the extent that historians are increasingly drawn to discussions of theater, performance, and spectacle (broadly defined), this volume provides some provocative insights into the strengths and weaknesses of a central category: "theatricality." Perhaps the most useful section of the volume is the introduction by editors Tracy C. Davis and Thomas Postlewait, which examines the inflationary use of that term and its recent rival, "performativity." Davis and Postlewait are rightfully concerned that "the idea of theatricality ... serves too many agendas" (p. 4) and risks losing meaning altogether. Via the metaphor of theatrum mundi ("all the world's a stage") it has expanded to embrace all of society. The word "theatricality" also conveys the contradictory attitudes toward theater itself, which for some is a forum for authentic expression; for others, the epitome of artifice and deceit; and for Brechtians and their successors, a means of analyzing society through an "alienating" approach that willfully employs that very artifice. The purpose of the six ensuing essays is to escape this muddle and rescue the utility of "theatricality" as a concept, without insisting on a unitary definition. . . .

There are about 559 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.