You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 265 words from this article are provided below; about 491 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.1 | The History Cooperative
108.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States



Joanne B. Freeman. Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2001. Pp. xxiv, 376. $29.95.

Joanne B. Freeman's book tackles the subject of political culture in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. According to Freeman, for national politicians, politics "was about friendship, not party; it involved honor as much as ideology; it relied on bonds of personal loyalty, not partisanship; and it was fueled by a concern for the public good, not by party spirit" (p. 260). Freeman sees national politics in the early republic as an unwieldly mess, and the code of honor as "a remedy for the barely controlled chaos of national public life." This code "formed the very infrastructure of national politics, providing a governing logic and weapons of war" (p. xviii). It was the culture of honor, Freeman claims, that brought stability to a highly contested political landscape. Freeman uses the concept of honor as both a focal point and an explanatory device to understand the political culture of the new nation. This culture of honor served both to define and to promote the nation's political elite. Ultimately, the intimate linking of the personal with the political produced alliances between friends that became "almost institutional" (p. 261), thus paving the way for party politics and a new kind of "warfare" based on partisanship rather than on personal reputation. Although Freeman declines to put a specific date on the demise of this political culture, its very success seems to have led to its extinction. . . .


There are about 491 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.