You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 275 words from this article are provided below; about 506 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 108.1 | The History Cooperative
108.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Asia



Catherine Pagani. "Eastern Magnificence&European Ingenuity": Clocks of Late Imperial China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. xvi, 286. $44.50.

Since David S. Landes's Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World (1983), historians have been well aware of the distinctiveness of this European invention and its apparent significance to European superiority. Focusing on the introduction of European mechanical clocks to China in the late sixteenth century, Catherine Pagani sets out the meanings for Chinese and Westerners of clock production for the Chinese market. She stresses that clocks were seen primarily as status symbols rather than timepieces in both China and Europe in the sixteenth century. Jesuit missionaries brought clocks to display their greater knowledge, which they deemed an indication of their religious faith's superiority. Emperors delighted in the mechanical clocks; these instruments and related automata were symbols of political power and, later, as they became available beyond the court, of social status and wealth. European clocks figured as one of the few items Europeans could find a market for in eighteenth-century China, although clock sales could not reverse the net flow of silver into the empire to pay for the porcelains, silks, and teas that streamed to Europe. Finally, Pagani examines the aesthetics of clock production and discerns the perceptions that Chinese and Westerners held of each other based on the particular characteristics of clocks produced in China and Europe; she argues that the differences in clocks produced for the Chinese market by Chinese and Europeans vividly illustrate the inability or unwillingness of Europeans to learn about Chinese preferences because they considered themselves superior culturally. . . .


There are about 506 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.