You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 335 words from this article are provided below; about 569 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.3 | The History Cooperative
107.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Saverio Giovacchini. Hollywood Modernism: Film and Politics in the Age of the New Deal. (Culture and the Moving Image.) Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2001. Pp. 292. Cloth $68.50, paper $22.95.

It is generally accepted today among film historians that the 1930s and early 1940s was truly a dynamic period in Hollywood, both with regard to the evolution of cinematic form and the creation of film content that either implicitly or explicitly engaged topical sociopolitical issues. Concomitantly, the latter 1930s witnessed a fierce debate among Americans as to how to respond to the increasing menace of totalitarian regimes, most particularly that of Nazi Germany. A number of significant books and articles have been published over the past twenty years that to varying degrees address the movies' relationship to this issue, namely The Inquisition in Hollywood: Politics and the Film Community, 1930–1960 (1979), by Larry Ceplair and Steven Englund; The Star-Spangled Screen: The American World War II Film (1985), by Bernard F. Dick; and Hollywood War Films, 1937–1945 (1996), by Michael S. Shull and David E. Wilt. Collectively, these studies largely concluded that many prominent Hollywood personalties, and a significant number of the films that they produced before December 7, 1941, were in the forefront of this national debate in the United States, and that overwhelmingly the content of those relevant films was unequivocably prodemocratic and/or antifascist. 1
     Saverio Giovacchini's use of contemporary studio documents and trade literature to further substantiate this thesis is impressive. He clearly identifies a creative symbiosis that began in the mid-1930s in America's filmmaking capital between a group of east-coast intellectuals, including writers Lillian Hellman and John Howard Lawson, and numerous German as well as other European émigrés who had escaped fascism, such as directors Fritz Lang and William Dieterle. Giovacchini invents the label of "democratic modernism" for this artistic phenomenon, that of inserting so-called political "realism" into the texts of many of the films on which these individuals were creatively involved. . . .


There are about 569 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.