Previous Section, 1 Oct. 1904
Previous Section, 1 Oct. 1904
  Next Chapter, 7 Mar. 1906
Next Chapter, 7 Mar. 1906
Go to Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents    
Print a lo-res (300 dpi x 150 dpi) PDF image of this page
   

 

 

The page presentation framework of the Booker T. Washington papers is designed to provide researchers worldwide with searchable access to the thousands of pages comprising the fourteen volumes, most of which are out of print. Adapted from the National Academy Press's Open Book framework, this framework allows searching down to the page level, provides sorting of search results chronologically, enables easy navigation across multiple volumes, and allows page-by-page local printing (via PDF) of every page.

[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ]

©2000 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved


OCRed data provided for searching only.
ADDE N DA headquarters. (Adams to BOW, July s8, ~ 904, BTW Papers, ATT; BTW to Adams, July 2B, 1904, Con. 18, BTW Papers, DLC.) 2 Barber's letter to Scott has not been located. It was probably the letter in which Barber alleged that Scott had a conflict of interest between the Voice of the Negro and another journal owned by BTW, the Colored American Magazine. See Scott to Hertel, Jenkins and Company, Aug. 4, 1904, and Austin N. Jenkins to Scott, Aug. 5, 1904, above, 8:38-40. From Clifford H. Plummer Boston Highlands Mass. Oct ~ ~ 904 They, hired oddfelDows has have circulars printed ~ have two thirds of them in my possession will go over tomorrow morning and collect three that wiD [be] placed at Churches. C. H. P. TWIT Con. 19 BROW Papers DLC. William Monroe Trotter and other anti-Bookerites planned an indignation meeting on the same night BTW was to speak in Cambridge, Mass. This telegram is in reply to BTW to Plummer, Sept. 19, ~ 904, above, 8: 75. From Bradley Oilman Boston Mass Dec 3~904 My dear Mr Washington, ~ hope that if Dr. Courtney saw you, at the train, in Boston, en route for New York, that he gave a good account of my effort at the meeting of the ''Boston Literary Society.'' ~ tried to be discreet, and I fancy that ~ was, because our friend Trotter was not drawn from his lair in a ferocious mood; he spoke, after me, but not excitedly, and did not mention you by name. Both Villard and ~ said our say about you, firmly and warmly, but not defiantly. It seems a pity that so ably edited a paper as the Guardian should be on the wrong side of your work. I wish it could be bought up and steered in the right direction. When Trotter referred indirectly to you, 511