Previous Section, May 1912
Previous Section, May 1912
  Next Chapter, July 1912
Next Chapter, July 1912
Go to Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents    
Print a lo-res (300 dpi x 150 dpi) PDF image of this page
   

 

 

The page presentation framework of the Booker T. Washington papers is designed to provide researchers worldwide with searchable access to the thousands of pages comprising the fourteen volumes, most of which are out of print. Adapted from the National Academy Press's Open Book framework, this framework allows searching down to the page level, provides sorting of search results chronologically, enables easy navigation across multiple volumes, and allows page-by-page local printing (via PDF) of every page.

[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ]

©2000 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved


OCRed data provided for searching only.
The BOOKER T. WAS HINGTON Papers To Charles B. Purvis [Tuskegee, Ala.] June Fifth, Nineteen Hundred Twelve Dear Dr. Purvis: Thank you for your letter from Washington.2 I shall follow your instructions and plan to be present at the next trustees meeting. You and I agree thoroughly regarding the new Bishop.2 We want to get somebody who is not in any way under his control or influence personally. I have practically no faith in him. ~ hope to talk with you before the meeting of the board. Yours very Fly, Booker T. Washington TLpS Con. 462 BTW Papers DLC. ~ Purvis wrote on Tune I, 19~2, urging BTW to attend the next Howard University board meeting and to nominate a strong candidate. He opposed any candidate that W. P. Thirkidd would propose ''upon general principles,'' and opposed ''creating a place for some hungry Methodist minister.'' He urged BTW out of his wide experience to name a candidate of broad outlook, saying: ''A business man is needed, a man of moral courage, ~ who has connections.'' (Con. 46~, BTW Papers, DLC.) 2 Wilbur Patterson l~hirkield. From Monroe Nathan Work [Tuskegee, Ala.] June 6, 1 ~ Mr. B. T. Washington: ~ have carefully examined Sheriff Daniel's letter of May concerning the commitments to the Macon County Jail. ~ have also had an interview with him. I find that the 226 commitments to jai] are all the persons that were ''Committed for offenses that are liable in Circuit and County Courts.'' This does not, however, include aD who had been arrested by the sheriff and his deputies. ~ do not believe that by taking jai] commitments you can get a clear convincing statement concerning the orderliness of Macon County as contrasted with other counties. The United States Census reports that in 1904 875 Colored persons were committed to aD jails, workhouses, and penitentiaries in the state. 54~8