Previous Section, Documents, 1911-12
Previous Section, Documents, 1911-12
  Next Chapter, Apr. 1911
Next Chapter, Apr. 1911
Go to Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents    
Print a lo-res (300 dpi x 150 dpi) PDF image of this page
   

 

 

The page presentation framework of the Booker T. Washington papers is designed to provide researchers worldwide with searchable access to the thousands of pages comprising the fourteen volumes, most of which are out of print. Adapted from the National Academy Press's Open Book framework, this framework allows searching down to the page level, provides sorting of search results chronologically, enables easy navigation across multiple volumes, and allows page-by-page local printing (via PDF) of every page.

[ Top of Page ] [ Home ] [ Contact Us ] [ Help ]

©2000 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
All rights reserved


OCRed data provided for searching only.
MARCH · I 9 I I From William Ashley Sunday1 Lima Ohio Mar c~ 19I I Your explanation regarding the unfortunate affair of Sunday night is believed and accepted by your hosts of friends throughout the west. We have unbounded confidence in your innocence and have no faith In reports to the contrary. ~ gave public expression to this sentiment before six thousand people assembled in religious meeting tonight. W A Sunday TWSr BTW Papers ATT. William Ashley (Billy) Sunday (~862-~935), a former professional baseball player (~883 - o), became an evangelist in the Lagos and was ordained as a Presbyterian minister in ~ 903. Alfred B. Cruikshank~ to Seth :Low New York, N.Y., Mar. 2 I, 191 ~ Dear Sir: I am glad to see that you have actively taken up the task of vindicating Dr. Washington from the preposterous charges made against him by the UIrichs. For the sake of the cause which Dr. Washington represents, we are all interested in having these stories put down as false and malicious. I see by the newspapers that UIrich now says that Dr. Washington assaulted him in the first place without provocation. I also gather that UIrich made no charge of this kind on Sunday night at the police station at the time the parties appeared before the police lieutenant. Had Dr. Washington assaulted Ulrich, as he now claims, he would undoubtedly have made that assault the basis of his original complaint, instead of the absurd complaint of peeping through a keyhole. It Is perfectly clear to my mind that this last story of an assault upon UIrich is an afterthought; in other words, a downright lie, gotten up in an attempt to justify his own atrocious assault. The mere fact that UIrich has changed his story in this essential particular is convincing, and in IS