|
|
Public Opinion and Communication Networks
© Robert Darnton / Princeton University Reception
In order to study contemporary reaction to the poems, one must consult the journals and memoirs of the time, but they were not written to satisfy the curiosity of modern researchers. They usually mention events rather than responses to verse. But the events themselves triggered responses, producing inadvertently a kind of propaganda of the deed, which spread at first by word of mouth and then through poetry and songs. Consider the event that produced the most versifying in 1748-1749, the abduction of prince Edouard. Barbier, the Parisian lawyer whose journal provides a sober assessment of public sentiment, reported it immediately as a major "événement d'Etat." He described the prince's arrest at the Opera in great detail, noting how word of it spread in ripples from the epicenter of the occurence:
Barbier remarked that newspapers, even the French-language gazettes of Holland, printed only the briefest account of the incident, presumably because of pressure from the French government, which, he claimed, feared a popular uprising in support of the prince.100 But the news continued to travel by word of mouth, fueling the "mauvais propos" for which people were arrested during the following weeks. Detailed reports, in the form of "bruits publics" and "on dits," kept Paris buzzing for two months, until the peace was officially proclaimed on February 12, 1749. By then indignation, both at the treatment of the prince and at the humiliation of the peace settlement, had reached the humblest levels of the population. The common people refused to shout "Vive le Roi!" during the elaborate ceremonies to celebrate the peace, according to Barbier:
Other media also spread the discontent. A burlesque poster, written in the form of a proclamation by George II, commanded Louis, as the errand-boy of the English, to capture prince Edouard and deliver him to the pope in Rome.105 A popular print caricatured Louis's humiliation in foreign affairs: bound and tied with his culotte pulled down, he was being whipped on his rear by Maria Theresa, while George ordered, "Frappez fort!" and the Dutch called out, "Il vendra tout."106 This caricature corresponded to the theme of other posters and canards and even to some seditious talk reported four years earlier by a police spy. A group of artisans drinking and playing cards in a tavern got into a dispute about the war. One of them called the king a "jean-foutre," adding, "Laissez faire, laissez faire, la reine de Hongrie donnera le fouet à Louis XV, comme la reine Anne l'a donné à Louis XIV."107 This outpouring of protest - in poems, songs, prints, posters, and talk - began in December 1748 and continued long after the fall of Maurepas on April 24, 1749. In trailing one poem, the "Ode sur l'exil de M. de Maurepas", the police tapped a vast reservoir of discontent that had little to do with Maurepas himself and that covered a great many issues. All the documentation, fragmentary as it is, suggests two conclusions: The poems turned up by the police formed only a small part of a huge literature of protest, and the network of the Quatorze constituted only a tiny segment of an enormous communication system, which extended through all sectors of Parisian society. But a crucial problem remains: how were those poems understood? In many ways, no doubt - most of them beyond the reach of research. To catch at least a glimpse of them, one must consult the few contemporary accounts that have survived. Three stand out. Each refers to the poems about the abduction of prince Edouard, "Quel est le sort des malheureux Français" and "Peuple jadis si fier, aujourd'hui si servile". Charles Collé, the songster-playwright, generally limited his journal to comments on the theatre; and when he mentioned politics, he showed no sympathy for popular protests. The poems offended both his political views and his professional sense of proper versification:
Barbier, the lawyer who also sympathized with royal policy, quoted the poems at length, commenting only that they were "très hardis" and expressed powerful public discontent.109 The marquis d'Argenson, an insider in Versailles who took a critical view of the government, also considered the poems shocking and attributed them to the "parti jacobite." But he explained that this faction actually spoke for all the discontented in the country and that it expressed a rising tide of public protest. Everyone around him, he claimed, had memorized "Quel est le triste sort des malheureux Français", all 84 lines; and he cited the lines that were quoted most often:
Of course "everyone" to the marquis d'Argenson probably meant nothing more than the elite of the court and the capital. But anti-royalist pamphleteers echoed his view in the 1780s, when they looked back on the reign of Louis XV and identified the poems as symptomatic of the moment when the king began to lose his hold on the allegiance of his subjects:
A Conceptual Problem
Appendix I: The Songs and Poems Distributed by the Quatorze
| ||||||||