|
Robert Darnton An Early Information Society
Online Discussion Archive:
Topic and Reply 5
Topic: Computer presentation of Darnton Article
Conf: Discussion of Darnton's Article
From: Robert Litchfield robert_litchfield@brown.edu
Date: Monday, March 27, 2000 02:12 PM
Since I am familiar with the argument (and indeed some of the
evidence) of Darnton's address through reading his earlier work, I
will focus on the computer presentation (which other commentators have
not mentioned). I am aware of the AHA/Mellon-funded Gutenberg-e
project and was interested to view the article in computer format to
see how the Gutenberg-e publications might turn out.
To begin with, I was disappointed that I could not print out the text,
since reading from text printed onto paper is my normal mode of
reading. (By exercising patience, I was able to copy the text--though
not the footnotes--into Microsoft Word, and thus to read the text in
the usual way.) But I notice that with the Stephen King novella
published electronically that was being discussed last week, you
apparently can't print out the text either, so I may have to give in
on this point. I did like the songs. I thought those were the only
really new thing about the article. And I liked the map, and the
reportage of gossip, too.
But I didn't think all the parts of the text-package were put together
too well. Why couldn't one get directly to the gossip reported from
*that* caf³ by clicking on the number on the map rather than by
looking at a separate file with all the gossip from all the caf³s? I
am not sure I thought the map added all that much, the locations of
the gossip didn't seem to have anything to do with the argument of the
article. Similarly, why couldn't you hear the song being referred to
by just clicking on a footnote or phrase in the text?
But I thought the songs were good, and I hope this experiment
forecasts a new stage in history where one can make use of maps,
illustrations, data files, even songs, easily, which publishers are
usually unwilling to include in book publications because their
publication in print is too expensive.
R. Burr Litchfield, Professor of History, Brown University.
Topic: Re: Computer presentation of Darnton Article
Conf: Discussion of Darnton's Article
From: Robert Darnton darnton@princeton.edu
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 02:20 PM
Other readers have echoed Burr Litchfield's frustration about the
difficulty of printing out pages, although the footnotes are easily
accessible from a separate file available from the site index. Perhaps
the _American Historical Review_ can find a way around this and other
problems in the future. In general, however, I think the team at the
_AHR_ did a remarkable job of combining textual, visual, and audio
material. To follow the narrative of the police investigation of the
songs, then to see their texts, and finally to hear them is, in my
view, a remarkable new way of taking in a historical argument. In the
case of the caf³ gossip, the argument concerned an overall change of
tone in the way people talked about the king, his mistresses, and his
ministers. It was not an argument about a correlation between
particular remarks and particular caf³s, although a careful reading of
the extensive excerpts from the police reports would show that the
talk tended to be more outspoken in certain places, like the Caf³
Coton. By showing how the caf³s were scattered across a vast stretch
of urban territory between the Bastille and the Tuileries Palace, the
map illustrates the extent of the political talk and pinpoints its
sites. It also gives the reader an opportunity to stroll imaginatively
through the streets of Paris and to listen in on conversations in one
caf³ after another. The mapping makes the process of visualization
feasible, because the Plan Turgot depicts all the houses in all the
neighborhoods of Paris at the time of the police reports. The
contemporary prints reproduced in the article fill out the picture by
illustrating the atmosphere inside the caf³s.
Of course, the evidence should not be taken literally. Maps are
symbolic texts, and so are copperplate engravings and musical
annotation. Neither the maps nor the prints nor the recordings of the
songs offer a perfect reproduction of sights and sounds that existed
270 years ago. For my part, I still am amazed that the editors and
research assistants at the _AHR_ and the Indiana University
Library--Michael Grossberg, Allyn Roberts, Sean Quinlan, Jian Liu, Ann
Bristow, and others--were able to put together such a rich combination
of documents. Before working with them, I had no idea of how difficult
and labor-intensive electronic publishing could be. Nor did I
appreciate the extent to which e-articles are a collective enterprise.
The staff of the _American Historical Review_ deserve recognition as
co-authors of this first attempt, and I would like to thank them for
making the first issue of the e-_AHR_ a resounding success.
Robert Darnton
Princeton University
Topic and Reply 1
Topic and Reply 2
Topic and Reply 3
Topic and Reply 4
Topic and Reply 5
|