|
Robert Darnton An Early Information Society
[Page 23]
designated by
formal presentation at court, had not yet solidified to the point
where she could consider herself invulnerable to gossip. A campaign
of derision, orchestrated by Maurepas and conducted by means of
songs, might persuade the king to renounce her in order to win back
the respect of his subjects. Such at least was the opinion of some
Parisians, who noted that the white flower song belonged to a flood
of hostile verse that coursed through the city during the first six
months of 1749.36
The
tide did not turn after the fall of Maurepasperhaps,
according to some observers, because his partisans kept up the
crescendo of songs after he had disappeared in order to prove that he
had not been responsible for them in the first place. But whatever
the tactics pursued at court, the singing in Paris caused the
government serious concern. With the backing of the king, d'Argenson
organized a campaign to wipe it out. He went into action as soon as
he learned that Parisians had taken up a new song with the first
line, "Monstre dont la noire furie" (Monster whose black
fury), the monster being Louis XV. From the ministry in Versailles to
police headquarters in Paris, an order went out: find the author of
the verse that began with those words. The order passed down the
chain of command from the lieutenant general of police to a squad of
inspectors and spies. And before long, Inspector Joseph d'Hémery
received a note from an undercover agent: "I know someone who
had a copy of the abominable verse against the king in his study a
few days ago and who spoke approvingly of them. I can tell you who he
is, if you want."37 Just two sentences, without a
signature, on a crumpled piece of paper, but they earned the spy
twelve louis d'or, the equivalent of nearly a year's wages for an
unskilled laborer, and they triggered an extraordinary poetry-hunt
and manhunt, which produced the richest dossiers of literary
detective work that I have ever encountered. By following the police
as they followed the poem, I will try to reconstruct a network that
shows how messages traveled through an oral communication system in
eighteenth-century Paris.38
After
a good deal of hugger-mugger, the police arrested the person who had
possessed a handwritten text of the verse, a medical student named
François Bonis. In his interrogation in the Bastille, he said
he had got it from a priest, Jean Edouard, who was arrested and said
he had got it from another priest, Inguimbert de Montange, who was
arrested and said he had got it from a third priest, Alexis Dujast,
who was arrested and said he had got it from a law student, Jacques
Marie Hallaire, who was arrested and said he had got it from a clerk
in a notary's office, Denis Louis Jouet, who was arrested . . . and
so on down the line, until the trail gave out and the police gave up,
fourteen arrests from the beginning. Each arrest generated its own
dossier, and each dossier contains new evidence about the modes of
communication. The overall pattern can be seen in the flow chart in
Figure 9.
Click here to go to the next page
|